From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 21:16:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6255316A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:16:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lars@gmx.at) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2D38643D45 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:16:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lars@gmx.at) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 16 Feb 2006 21:16:16 -0000 Received: from 43.85.77.83.cust.bluewin.ch (EHLO [192.168.1.10]) [83.77.85.43] by mail.gmx.net (mp038) with SMTP; 16 Feb 2006 22:16:16 +0100 X-Authenticated: #912863 Message-ID: <43F4EBA7.9070804@gmx.at> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:16:23 +0100 From: lars User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20060216005036.L60635@ganymede.hub.org> <20060216053725.GB15586@parts-unknown.org> <20060216085304.GA52806@storage.mine.nu> <20060216121442.X60635@ganymede.hub.org> <43F4ACC5.1040200@gmx.at> <20060216154733.D60635@ganymede.hub.org> In-Reply-To: <20060216154733.D60635@ganymede.hub.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Subject: Re: [Total OT] Trying to improve some numbers ...s X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: lars@gmx.at List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:16:23 -0000 Marc G. Fournier wrote: > Wait, I think we are talking about two different things ... I'm not > looking at 'how long its been up', I'm looking at % of time its been up > ... rebooting a server once a month to upgrade it, even if its down for > 5min, is about 99.989% uptime, which is a good number, but the OS is > still up to date ... > > The 'metric' one should be looking at is how *much* the server is up, > not how *long* ... Ok, I see what you're getting at. "Uptime since first start-up ever", right? IMHO this should be changed from uptime in days|hours|minutes|seconds to availability in percent. And here "availability" is defined as ports/sysutils/uptimec being able to send it's status to some recipient.