Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 11:50:35 -0700 From: Freddie Cash <fjwcash@gmail.com> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: there is a way to avoid strict libraries linking? Message-ID: <n2jb269bc571004141150ofe0f906cr8e8ac34c49e234f3@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <x2ua2585ef1004141118m80991b08of6f7ac2478c0009e@mail.gmail.com> References: <n2ya2585ef1004140923s2acb8b2ctf7c9b449cb66f208@mail.gmail.com> <20100414174853.GC43908@dan.emsphone.com> <x2ua2585ef1004141118m80991b08of6f7ac2478c0009e@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Leinier Cruz Salfran < salfrancl.listas@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com> > wrote:> Just because you > > Anyway, the FreeBSD port maintainers usually bump the > > revision of dependant ports when a major library like libpng gets > upgraded, > > to force everyone to upgrade anything that depends on it. > > > > mmm .. I think it's not true because I maintain a port and i'm VERY > VERY restricted to update the port because I depends on a mentor that > will ONLY update the port in fbsd svn tree if I sent to him the > tinderbox log of the sucessfully build of the port .. so I have not > much patience to do all this things so I update the port and do ALL > task including constructing the package into tinderbox ONLY when a new > version of the program is available .. and I think that exists a lot > of ports maintainers that are in same situation > > do you agree with me that it's difficult to a port maintainer to > update his/her port because of this restriction???? > The port maintainer doesn't *have to* update anything. When library ports go through a library bump like this, all the ports that depend on it get an automatic PORTREVISION bump. All the port maintainer has to do is double-check that the port compiles with the new version of the lib. Only if there are issues with that (which usually get picked up by the -exp runs on the ports cluster), then the port maintainer has to step in and fix things. 9 times out of 10, a port maintainer doesn't have to do anything with a port until a new version of the app is released. > could be a good idea to plan and implement a system to allow fbsd > ports maintainers to maintain easyly the own ports via web or mail > ONCE a fbsd mentor have uploaded his/her port to fbsd svn > tree???????????? > In several years of port maintainership, I've never had a need for anything like this. A new version of an app I maintain is released, I update the port locally, test it, submit a PR with the update, someone looks at it and sends back suggestions/issues, the port is fixed locally and patches re-submitted to the PR, and then the port is committed to the tree. Overall, not a long process. If you maintain enough ports for enough time, and generate enough committed PRs to annoy people enough, you get rewarded with a commit bit. :) -- Freddie Cash fjwcash@gmail.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?n2jb269bc571004141150ofe0f906cr8e8ac34c49e234f3>