Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 01:16:42 -0500 (CDT) From: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com> To: Alan Cox <alc@cs.rice.edu> Cc: Max Khon <fjoe@samodelkin.net> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/sys mbuf.h src/sys/kern uipc_mbuf.c uipc_syscalls.c src/usr.bin/netstat mbuf.c src/lib/libc/sys sendfile.2 Message-ID: <20040618011324.J72823@odysseus.silby.com> In-Reply-To: <20040617232217.GC18591@cs.rice.edu> References: <200406170008.i5H08NDt085108@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040617182031.GA8170@samodelkin.net> <20040617204813.GA10670@samodelkin.net> <20040617214827.GB6029@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> <7071.208.178.23.220.1087509793.squirrel@208.178.23.220> <20040617232217.GC18591@cs.rice.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004, Alan Cox wrote: > This is true of RELENG_4. In HEAD sf_bufs are very different. They > are used to implement pipes, swap-backed mds, exec_map_first_page(), I understand that, but I don't see it as a reason to remove sfbuf statistics from netstat -m. sfbufs certainly have an important role for anyone running Apache 2 (which uses sendfile by default), and if someone is having network memory shortages, it makes sense to show them the relevant info when they go looking. Mike "Silby" Silbersack
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040618011324.J72823>