Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2019 08:39:12 +0200 From: Antoine Brodin <antoine@freebsd.org> To: Koichiro Iwao <meta@freebsd.org> Cc: Adam Weinberger <adamw@adamw.org>, FreeBSD Ports <ports@freebsd.org>, ruby@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FLAVORS for Ruby Message-ID: <CAALwa8=ZE%2BEiTduwNub_YGh6PGNGoUUfzu49q4Aiym_bDc4BmQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20190914042738.r3hedyqtpxsxnd5e@icepick.vmeta.jp> References: <20190913074519.xfu3avb4ihmfzm2o@icepick.vmeta.jp> <CAALwa8m3NJSckxSyrVTehx3LWxheSJXxUB=iAxr%2B1HG_2WFtfg@mail.gmail.com> <20190913090645.buutinhgh2pygb4h@icepick.vmeta.jp> <CAP7rwcjH6d7AiEL4XeRyQ-evT=dq%2BZi8WDTx-aYhye-zq2DKJw@mail.gmail.com> <20190914042738.r3hedyqtpxsxnd5e@icepick.vmeta.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 6:27 AM Koichiro Iwao <meta@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 09:33:43AM -0600, Adam Weinberger wrote: > > Systems MUST be able to support concurrent installations of python2.7 > > and actual python. What is your use case for concurrent ruby? > > I know the importance of Python 2. Even if it is EoL-ed, it will be > required over the next a few years because not a few applications don't > migrate to Python 3. So that's true and reasonable. > > Excuse me that I'm answering your question with a question. What about > PHP? Concurrent installation is a MUST? > > FreeBSD ports allows concurrent installations of multiple Ruby versions > however doesn't allow concurrent installations of rubygems for multiple > Ruby versions. This inconsistency is the issue for me. This isn't a valid reason for me. Why do you need ruby version 2.4 or 2.5 concurrently installed with version 2.6? Is there a bug in version 2.6? Cheers, Antoine
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAALwa8=ZE%2BEiTduwNub_YGh6PGNGoUUfzu49q4Aiym_bDc4BmQ>