From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 16 17:40:08 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEA61106566C for ; Sun, 16 Jan 2011 17:40:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD8EB8FC0A for ; Sun, 16 Jan 2011 17:40:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p0GHe83K092260 for ; Sun, 16 Jan 2011 17:40:08 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p0GHe84K092259; Sun, 16 Jan 2011 17:40:08 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 17:40:08 GMT Message-Id: <201101161740.p0GHe84K092259@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Gerald Pfeifer Cc: Subject: Re: ports/151747: request to enable emulators/wine on amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Gerald Pfeifer List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 17:40:09 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/151747; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Gerald Pfeifer To: David Naylor , bug-followup@freebsd.org Cc: kenorb@gmail.com Subject: Re: ports/151747: request to enable emulators/wine on amd64 Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 18:30:28 +0100 (CET) On Thu, 6 Jan 2011, David Naylor wrote: > I never thought of it that way but yes, you are right. I rebuild > everything so updates should propergate every wine release (~ every > two weeks). Maybe it would be easier to get wine to statically link? That does not strike me as desirable, both in terms of security but als general updates (or stability) as well as resource usage. The only real fix is for FreeBSD to start handling a 32-bit environment on a 64-bit platform as well as several Linux distributions have been doing for about a decade. > Currently the wine-fbsd64 port is i386 only. I have considered a method > of getting the port to work under amd64: by using the package produced > from the i386 build. Is there any interest in that? Any ideas on how > to do that? Sadly that exceeds my area of expertise. I will look into your patch and see whether/how I can feel comfortable adjusting the general wine port to support your efforts. Gerald