Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2024 10:50:13 -0800 From: John Hixson <jhixson@freebsd.org> To: Michael Osipov <michaelo@freebsd.org> Cc: Gleb Popov <arrowd@freebsd.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Re: git: ece1cb52e7ff - main - security/sssd: mark port deprecated Message-ID: <6ecpzfhdipmjvxwqabxohzam4uyzwtjomizvm73ttofutcu37g@odfxr2idgp64> In-Reply-To: <16f9baa7-1e25-49d9-9f31-0aafd528250a@FreeBSD.org> References: <202402030553.4135rFLH050086@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <CALH631kLSy5rBFtXsUbDeXUQ-8P3oWZ6pkN6Tz%2BTwinnifNd6w@mail.gmail.com> <a7ee24f4-2ba3-4bb4-a306-0ed89728ab8a@FreeBSD.org> <cy3g5xomwle67x3h2spzd67hzjweojiubw5op3ka2h5szwoz5c@t4sbqefurn6c> <16f9baa7-1e25-49d9-9f31-0aafd528250a@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--v2emordw2stsfllw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Feb 07, 2024 at 07:09:13PM +0100, Michael Osipov wrote: > >=20 > > What is the proper route to take here? sssd-devel isn't really a "devel" > > port. It's just the up to date version of sssd. The current sssd port is > > very old (like 5 years or more). I would like to just replace it with > > the new version but don't want to force an update for anyone who may > > rely on it. Should sssd-devel be renamed sssd2 and sssd be renamed sssd1 > > or some such? What is this POLA that I am possibly violating by the way? >=20 > I see your point it is partially valid to me. I'd expect sssd-devel to fo= rm > off a non-release version, namely a Git hash. As for security/sssd: Almost > just like you said. Deprecate and introduce security/sssd2. Very similar = to > what security/krb5* or security/openssl* are don't. That scheme would > resemble. I wouldn't touch security/sssd in terms of renaming anymore. Wh= en > sssd 3 comes out, you can have another parallel port for that. > POLA violation for me is that an apparently valid port is replaced with a > devel one. >=20 Thanks for the clarification. I'll get this sorted out by this weekend. Cheers, - John --v2emordw2stsfllw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAABCgB9FiEEJaAswQZQMflCdCA6RqljBb/iPUAFAmXD0N9fFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDI1 QTAyQ0MxMDY1MDMxRjk0Mjc0MjAzQTQ2QTk2MzA1QkZFMjNENDAACgkQRqljBb/i PUDF4BAAgD5ksQ93mxmrWpsxZnXYs8Zfcc7VVcYASKLSo75cuqJIbKs+PmUypMSJ wLuhNw4tLAZFtC6nX80Sbf9yaTUH3DoU4xCz3ROk02GRvDWzyP8aEBc1S2SjQvL3 kkS3LH0H0JmVw+uR2cp2yN2oqOa9kmVU6zX80k7IcEODfFqtFq4dPlvaEQoqSAYv PmxvnFJgxO+6kps7lpQftOwKxWAE9WQ7CB6XyNDE6gyuzAVavAZZbaGrCAK3Aooz p+UP1WZbj8yNCNqGu2nw9NiwMCmGCdzUkUgJCSQeL+6rlUvSF8JzXUgnUD0CA9dr z4xGOaJAJZ7eYQvwMlqg6E7PAUEysSljDlG+DR5Qvh6fCrfa+CJDZV10hv96ThbN p1NNUKQQXci0b7LkIHzV0ohB5Uerw9dfA0s1JnhpxyZ9ut+PTmoW8lrA818naT2R qB7lBQ6dgyAsbPe7ZYYe9wz3Xd32d04WVWZq4BvQNruX37Fqptlq3s2+oKAJJOcH nj6Ba58XSYUS3GP6gbz6WB8KhB/5umALdsux7ur+EqZS3Sx4xhmjKf5n2VvrfkGM qnyJD1JosI72mMvY0RDyx1EvJAqxP+QbDmp2PhTsU6Q2F5wd3wkp0yfPivysJTnQ kzpjARbM98/7MuOJHBQJj0x4KqAjQogejhppR5/ByZjIc4qjgc8= =DID7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --v2emordw2stsfllw--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6ecpzfhdipmjvxwqabxohzam4uyzwtjomizvm73ttofutcu37g>