From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Jan 27 15:17:37 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from smtp1.mx.pitdc1.stargate.net (smtp1.mx.pitdc1.stargate.net [206.210.69.141]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 31AB637B416 for ; Sun, 27 Jan 2002 15:17:35 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 2774 invoked from network); 27 Jan 2002 23:17:33 -0000 Received: from dap-209-166-135-48.nfas.greensburg-tnt-1.sns234.pa.stargate.net (HELO wastegate.net) (209.166.135.48) by smtp1.mx.pitdc1.stargate.net with SMTP; 27 Jan 2002 23:17:33 -0000 Received: from mother.wastegate.net (mother.wg.local [192.168.1.2]) by wastegate.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 4A7A748449; Sun, 27 Jan 2002 18:18:13 -0500 (EST) From: "Doug Reynolds" To: "burnscharlesn@hotmail.com" , "TD790@aol.com" Cc: "questions@freebsd.org" Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 18:20:14 -0500 Reply-To: "Doug Reynolds" X-Mailer: PMMail 2000 Professional (2.20.2380) For Windows 98 (4.10.2222) In-Reply-To: <30.21367d4f.29846039@aol.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: 64-bit PCI mobos Message-Id: <20020127231813.4A7A748449@wastegate.net> Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, 26 Jan 2002 14:40:41 EST, TD790@aol.com wrote: >> say that it there are no such 1U power supplies..., and the fact that *U >> chassis are generally servers (as most desktop systems are not >> rack-mounted). It is uncommon to see an i810 or i815 system being used as >a >> servers because the chipsets are definitely not designed as such, the i810 >> being a low end consumer-grade chipset and the i815 not even being able to >> use more than 2 PC133 modules without going outside the specs. (It also >has >> some problems using USB mice in certain situations). >> >Who said anything about servers? > >apologies if they are warranted, but your implication that it might be >acceptable for a MB to spontaneosly reboot with a 180W P/S that is spec'd at >less than 150 was so ridiculous that It needed to be quashed. > >Anyway, eat the poison berries if you'd like. Those that care have the info >they need. if it produces under it's rated ammount, if it is lower than the motherboard requires, all kinds of funky shit can happen. --- doug reynolds | the maverick | mav@wastegate.net PGP Public Key Fingerprint: 6E7B 9993 B503 6D45 E33A 2019 26E5 C1DB To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message