From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 18 13:45:13 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF8BD16A4CE for ; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 13:45:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rwcrmhc11.comcast.net (rwcrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.198.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C831243D2D for ; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 13:45:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from be-well.no-ip.com ([66.30.196.44]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc11) with ESMTP id <2004061813444001300gjq1qe>; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 13:44:40 +0000 Received: by be-well.no-ip.com (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 6346C74; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 09:44:39 -0400 (EDT) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: "dave" References: <000701c45248$7dd28c90$0200a8c0@satellite> <447ju78xdb.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <001201c454e7$fc801ed0$0200a8c0@satellite> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 18 Jun 2004 09:44:39 -0400 In-Reply-To: <001201c454e7$fc801ed0$0200a8c0@satellite> Message-ID: <44wu25ugjc.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 11 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: using apm to power a system down, 5.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 13:45:14 -0000 "dave" writes: > Yes, there is a kernel apm module. I've also disabled acpi via device.hints, > and enabled apm via that file as well. I've also put apm_enable in rc.conf. > Is this overkill? Is the kernel module *loaded*? [I fixed up my scratch machine and this seems to work there, with the same kind of configuration, but I built APM into the kernel on that machine.]