From owner-freebsd-current  Fri Jul 12 14:58:09 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id OAA21157
          for current-outgoing; Fri, 12 Jul 1996 14:58:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (tip-mp4-ncs-2.Stanford.EDU [36.173.0.81])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id OAA21138
          for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 12 Jul 1996 14:58:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (8.7.5/8.6.12) id OAA01235; Fri, 12 Jul 1996 14:57:48 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 1996 14:57:48 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199607122157.OAA01235@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>
To: plm@xs4all.nl
CC: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
In-reply-to: <87pw612ydr.fsf@localhost.xs4all.nl> (message from Peter Mutsaers on 12 Jul 1996 19:08:00 +0200)
Subject: Re: javac_netscape updates
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

 * I still see some updates to javac_netscape, while (AFAIK) it doesn't
 * work at all. Am I wrong in this assumption?

As far as I know, you are correct.  However, it should start working
once the netscape guys fix their Java code.  In other words, it isn't
javac_netscape that is broken.

Satoshi