From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Feb 27 14:18:03 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id OAA09388 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 27 Feb 1995 14:18:03 -0800
Received: from tfs.com (mailhub.tfs.com [140.145.250.1]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with SMTP id OAA09378; Mon, 27 Feb 1995 14:17:58 -0800
Received: by tfs.com (smail3.1.28.1) 
Message-Id: <m0rjDjJ-0003wPC@TFS.COM>
From: julian@tfs.com (Julian Elischer)
Subject: Re: Binary compatibility with NetBSD
To: nate@trout.sri.MT.net (Nate Williams)
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 1995 14:15:49 -0800 (PST)
Cc: richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk, jkh@freefall.cdrom.com,
        freebsd-hackers@freefall.cdrom.com
In-Reply-To: <199502271531.IAA04715@trout.sri.MT.net> from "Nate Williams" at Feb 27, 95 08:31:31 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 339       
Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> 
> > Just to re-iterate, my suggestion is to (a) make ld.so compatible and
> 
> 
This suggest that we have a /usr/shlib/NetBSD
which would be good because it would fit in with the
/usr/shlib/iBSC2-SCO
and
/usr/shlib/Linux
that are already coming down the pipeline.
we could then have:
/usr/shlib/FreeBSD-1 for the compat stuff.

julian