From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 07:44:21 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60EC416A4BF for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2003 07:44:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hysteria.spc.org (hysteria.spc.org [195.206.69.234]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1D9CA43FF9 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2003 07:44:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bms@hysteria.spc.org) Received: (qmail 16109 invoked by uid 5013); 3 Sep 2003 14:41:00 -0000 Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2003 15:41:00 +0100 From: Bruce M Simpson To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20030903144100.GJ18369@spc.org> References: <20030903143948.GA61515@gattaca.yadt.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030903143948.GA61515@gattaca.yadt.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Organization: SPC Subject: Re: (proposal) new flag for pkg_delete X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2003 14:44:21 -0000 On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 03:39:48PM +0100, David Taylor wrote: > (I hope this is the right list) Certainly is, although letting ports people know of an intended change wouldn't hurt. > Then portupgrade could be changed to use '-F' instead of '-f' (or whatever > it is eventually called), and should stop deleting config files. I'm definitely in favour. Wiping config files is Bad. I have been bitten by this before. BMS