From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Feb 15 15:57:59 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA25793 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Mon, 15 Feb 1999 15:57:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from exchange-server.modacad.com (mail.modacad.com [206.253.27.98]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA25783 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 1999 15:57:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from matthew@netsol.net) Received: from mattl (node99.modacad.com [206.253.27.99]) by exchange-server.modacad.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2448.0) id 1LGCK4RB; Mon, 15 Feb 1999 15:56:53 -0800 Message-ID: <003701be58fc$94a8dcd0$0d2814ac@mattl.MAIN> From: "Matthew" To: "Drew Baxter" Cc: Subject: Re: 3.0 unable to receive packet by default? Date: Mon, 15 Feb 1999 16:02:26 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Your 3.0 is running on a single CPU style. I compiled the smp kernel and then just going right in the debuging mode. Looks like single CPU configuration is stable. -----Original Message----- From: Drew Baxter To: Matthew Date: Tuesday, February 16, 1999 12:03 AM Subject: Re: 3.0 unable to receive packet by default? >At 10:47 AM 2/15/99 , Matthew wrote: >>Is there any version that is reliable like 2.2.2. The 3.0 I run through me >>in debuging mode with smp eabled. >> >>Is 2.8 release kernel's same as 2.2.2? where the vm is not messed up? > >Well I used to be a 2.1 user until I moved up to 3.0.. I've been using 3.0 >since the first SNAP releases, and I Must say, it's a vast improvement. It >is very reliable for me, and my PII-333 with 32mb does a good job over the >POS Windows NT Workstation with 128mb.. > >2.2.8 probably has some improvements over 2.2.2.. As it goes I haven't >touched 2.2 since I moved upward to 3.0. 3.0 IS worth the moving up, >although you may want to work with a 2.2 server and then CVSUP the Current, >then do a make aout-to-elf. Perhaps that would fix any problems you're having. > >It would seem your ability to get connections in may be to do with inetd or >your connection though. Any connectivity problems I had were either due to >IPFW (which I strongly recommend having running), or due to problems with >my NIC configuration. But if 2.2 works fine for you, then perhaps starting >there and doing the upgrade may be an easier transition. > > >--- >Drew "Droobie" Baxter >Network Admin/Professional Computer Nerd(TM) >OneEX: The OneNetwork Exchange, Bangor Maine USA >http://www.droo.orland.me.us > >PGP DSS/1024 Public Key ID: 0x409A1F7D > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message