From owner-freebsd-current Thu Mar 19 03:46:36 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id DAA10773 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Thu, 19 Mar 1998 03:46:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [195.8.129.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id DAA10768 for ; Thu, 19 Mar 1998 03:46:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA02544; Thu, 19 Mar 1998 12:46:09 +0100 (CET) To: Michael Hancock cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4 WILLRELE's to bite the dust In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 19 Mar 1998 20:06:30 +0900." Date: Thu, 19 Mar 1998 12:46:09 +0100 Message-ID: <2542.890307969@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message , Mich ael Hancock writes: >On Thu, 19 Mar 1998, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >> Hi mike, I let this patch run on a machine for some days and it slowly >> ground to a halt and finally locked up solid. No dump, sorry. > >Umm. What fs's are you using and what was the kernel build date? > >Thanks for the info, it sounds like I have more vops that share the fs >code I touched and they need a VRELE at the top layer. Are you using NFS? FFS+NFS, although NFS only occasionally. The FFS must be responsible for the problem, since NFS wasn't mounted for most of the time. -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." "Drink MONO-tonic, it goes down but it will NEVER come back up!" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message