From owner-freebsd-questions  Wed Jan 24 20:53:43 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from femail3.sdc1.sfba.home.com (femail3.sdc1.sfba.home.com [24.0.95.83])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A301337B400
	for <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 24 Jan 2001 20:53:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from home.com ([24.177.141.133]) by femail3.sdc1.sfba.home.com
          (InterMail vM.4.01.03.00 201-229-121) with ESMTP
          id <20010125045137.RAGC21891.femail3.sdc1.sfba.home.com@home.com>;
          Wed, 24 Jan 2001 20:51:37 -0800
Message-ID: <3A6FB145.C030144B@home.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 20:53:25 -0800
From: "Raymundo M. Vega" <RaymundoVega@home.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 3.5.1-RELEASE i386)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ralph Dratman <ralph@maxsoft.com>
Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: inetd services very slow to respond
References: <v04210104b69540b61bfb@[192.0.0.27]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Ralph Dratman wrote:
> 
> The name resolution is fast in both directions, whether to or from
> the slow machine. There's no apparent delay.
> 
> Here's another twist to the story: I stopped inetd and started it
> again with -dl (debugging and logging to standard output) flags. Now
> the services are operating without delay!
> 
> C'mon, group, this is a QUESTION...
> 
> (Did activity on this list suddenly go away or is that just my imagination?)
> 
> Ralph
> 

I once had a similar problem, if I remember right it had to do
with the NIC card configuration, a quick and dirty solution was
to start the inetd process from rc.local. then i searched the real
problem and started inetd at the right place.

raymundo


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message