From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Dec 20 12:35:51 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA318106564A;
	Tue, 20 Dec 2011 12:35:51 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com)
Received: from ainaz.pair.com (ainaz.pair.com [209.68.2.66])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A99DE8FC12;
	Tue, 20 Dec 2011 12:35:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.212.79] (unknown [210.79.217.13])
	by ainaz.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D53023F417;
	Tue, 20 Dec 2011 07:35:43 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 21:36:07 +0900 (EIT)
From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>
To: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <4EEF130E.6080500@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1112202133250.27755@zbenl.fvgr>
References: <4EE9D2F6.2090906@FreeBSD.org>
	<alpine.LNX.2.00.1112152338530.11601@zbenl.fvgr>
	<alpine.LNX.2.00.1112191504200.2707@zbenl.fvgr>
	<4EEF130E.6080500@FreeBSD.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Cc: FreeBSD Ports <ports@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: lang/gcc on freebsd 10
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 12:35:51 -0000

On Mon, 19 Dec 2011, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> The patch worked for me too, thank you.

Thanks, Andriy.  I'll commit the patch momentarily, with two updates:
removing patches for ChangeLogs, and fixing an issue with a library
getting named .0.0.so (by pulling in another upstream patch).

> The only small trouble with it was that the resulting 
> files/patch-freebsd10 had the dos line endings.

Hmm, I think that must have happened when I mailed it (though no
Windows machine was involved)?  The patch as I applied it should
not have those.

Gerald