From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu May  9 18:00:58 1996
Return-Path: owner-stable
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id SAA20823
          for stable-outgoing; Thu, 9 May 1996 18:00:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from whizzo.transsys.com (whizzo.TransSys.COM [144.202.42.10])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id SAA20785
          Thu, 9 May 1996 18:00:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost.transsys.com (localhost.transsys.com [127.0.0.1]) by whizzo.transsys.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id VAA11041; Thu, 9 May 1996 21:00:33 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <199605100100.VAA11041@whizzo.transsys.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: whizzo.transsys.com: Host localhost.transsys.com [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol
To: Randy Terbush <randy@zyzzyva.com>
cc: davidg@Root.COM, stable@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org
From: "Louis A. Mamakos" <louie@TransSys.COM>
Subject: Re: Continued MBUF problem with ET V.35 card 
References: <199605092030.PAA01625@sierra.zyzzyva.com> 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 09 May 1996 15:30:09 CDT."
             <199605092030.PAA01625@sierra.zyzzyva.com> 
Date: Thu, 09 May 1996 21:00:33 -0400
Sender: owner-stable@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> I'm going to direct a copy of this back to the current and stable lists...
> 
> I have been able to pin this down to routed, or rather the use of
> a routing protocol, since firing up gated to use RIP has the same
> effect. (growth of mbuf use by about 10mbufs/30sec).
> 
> I've read some other questions raised lately about routing/routed
> problems. Anyone have a hint as to what might be going on here?

Just a wild guess, but it sounds like broadcast packets might be
implicated.  Just a thought..

louie