Date: Thu, 09 May 1996 21:00:33 -0400 From: "Louis A. Mamakos" <louie@TransSys.COM> To: Randy Terbush <randy@zyzzyva.com> Cc: davidg@Root.COM, stable@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Continued MBUF problem with ET V.35 card Message-ID: <199605100100.VAA11041@whizzo.transsys.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 09 May 1996 15:30:09 CDT." <199605092030.PAA01625@sierra.zyzzyva.com> References: <199605092030.PAA01625@sierra.zyzzyva.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I'm going to direct a copy of this back to the current and stable lists... > > I have been able to pin this down to routed, or rather the use of > a routing protocol, since firing up gated to use RIP has the same > effect. (growth of mbuf use by about 10mbufs/30sec). > > I've read some other questions raised lately about routing/routed > problems. Anyone have a hint as to what might be going on here? Just a wild guess, but it sounds like broadcast packets might be implicated. Just a thought.. louie
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199605100100.VAA11041>