From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 6 00:37:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9289616A4CE for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2004 00:37:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.musha.org (daemon.musha.org [210.189.104.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36D3943D2F for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2004 00:37:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from knu@iDaemons.org) Received: from archon.local.idaemons.org (archon.local.idaemons.org [192.168.1.32]) by mail.musha.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FDC4B612; Tue, 6 Apr 2004 16:36:59 +0900 (JST) Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2004 16:36:59 +0900 Message-ID: <86d66l5zhg.knu@iDaemons.org> From: "Akinori MUSHA" To: Jeremy Messenger In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Associated I. Daemons X-PGP-Public-Key: finger knu@FreeBSD.org X-PGP-Fingerprint: 081D 099C 1705 861D 4B70 B04A 920B EFC7 9FD9 E1EE MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by EMIKO 1.14.1 - "Choanoflagellata") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: I have patches of update and few new ports of ruby-gnome2-all X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2004 07:37:20 -0000 Hi, At Tue, 06 Apr 2004 01:20:32 -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote: > I have updated ruby-gnome2-all (around 11 ports) 0.8.0 -> 0.9.1 and > around four new ports such as ruby-gtkhtml, ruby-atk and etc. I have > put your email in the MAINTAINER in those new ports if it's ok with > you? Those new ports are came from the same tarball of > ruby-gnome2-all. I have tested almost all of examples and they work Nice to hear that. I spent a bit of time trying to update it but couldn't work out due to lack of time and vitality. If you have them, because you seem to, please take over the maintainership of those ruby-gnome2 ports! > great. Only one ruby-gst is going to be mark broken and disable in the > ruby-gnome2-all, because it will not compile with the new gstreamer > 0.8 API/ABI. I guess this will be coped with in no distant future. You can leave the ruby-gst port broken for a while. > How would like you me to do with the PR? Seperate them like a PR of > diff file to update 0.9.1 and each PRs of new port? Or, put all of > them together in a PR? If I do the seperate, then you will have to > commit the new ports at the same time with update 0.9.1 to make > ruby-gtk2 works since it needs new ruby-atk port. You can arrange the patches in one PR. I'll take care of it. > BTW: I still need to finish three more new ports, which they should be > finish by tonight or tomorrow. Great. Please Cc: me when you submit a PR. Thanks! -- / /__ __ Akinori.org / MUSHA.org / ) ) ) ) / FreeBSD.org / Ruby-lang.org Akinori MUSHA aka / (_ / ( (__( @ iDaemons.org / and.or.jp "It seems to me as we make our own few circles 'round the sun We get it backwards and our seven years go by like one"