From owner-freebsd-scsi Tue Apr 15 20:14:33 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id UAA02106 for freebsd-scsi-outgoing; Tue, 15 Apr 1997 20:14:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tor-adm1.nbc.netcom.ca (taob@tor-adm1.nbc.netcom.ca [207.181.89.5]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA02097 for ; Tue, 15 Apr 1997 20:14:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (taob@localhost) by tor-adm1.nbc.netcom.ca (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id XAA12293 for ; Tue, 15 Apr 1997 23:13:02 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 1997 23:13:01 -0400 (EDT) From: Brian Tao To: scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Best bet for stable AHA-2940UW server? In-Reply-To: <19970415203121.01225@klemm.gtn.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I am putting together an NFS server for a client with about 30,000 users. He already has a P200 with two Adaptec 2940UW controllers and a handful of 4.3GB ultrawide drives to go with them. What is the most sane choice of FreeBSD release to go with for this server? 2.2.1 seems to have all sorts of problems with the Adaptec. Should I try 3.0-970209-SNAP, or go with 2.2.1 and grab the newest aic7xxx.c? -- Brian Tao (BT300, taob@netcom.ca) "Though this be madness, yet there is method in't"