From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Wed Jan 11 13:37:07 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 273D8CAAF56; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 13:37:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02EDB1EAF; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 13:37:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 6B9B25DC7; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 13:37:02 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 13:37:02 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Larry Rosenman Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r431156 - in head/www: . miniminiweb Message-ID: <20170111133702.GA36222@FreeBSD.org> References: <201701110304.v0B34f5u031359@repo.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201701110304.v0B34f5u031359@repo.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 13:37:07 -0000 On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 03:04:41AM +0000, Larry Rosenman wrote: > New Revision: 431156 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/431156 > > Log: > New Port www/miniminiweb > > MiniMiniWeb is my attempt at creating a multithreaded web server in C. > > Features (and Misfeatures) > > Written in C > Multithreaded (with pthread) > Designed for Unix-like systems > Supports GET and POST requests > Only serves static files > No SSL > No CGI or anything "dynamic" > No Virtual Hosts > No Directory Listings (gotten pulled out) > No IPv6 May I ask what makes it useful to be included in the Ports Collection? There're plenty of different production-quality webservers already available, and mind that we don't just go and port whatever project we find on GitHub without sufficiently strong rationale. Neither port's description nor PR did answer this question. ./danfe