Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2000 19:40:33 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: "# Version required:" Message-ID: <20000212194033.A43572@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0002121852250.91963-100000@freefall.freebsd.org>; from kris@FreeBSD.org on Sat, Feb 12, 2000 at 06:54:01PM -0800 References: <20000212185016.A4538@relay.nuxi.com> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0002121852250.91963-100000@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Feb 12, 2000 at 06:54:01PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > My concern is that if we remove the information now it will be harder to > put it back later Why? > even though a lot of ports haven't kept the version required field > up-to-date. It is so out of date, a perl script grabbing the version from the PKGNAME/DISTNAME line would be more useful. You also failed to state how you think information would work, so again, what we have now may be totally out of date. Also the "Version required" is the distfile's version, not the ports's version. Are you really planning on auto updating based on that version string? Thus add it back when there is a need for it and it is know what is needed. -- -- David (obrien@NUXI.com) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000212194033.A43572>