Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 15:24:53 -0800 From: David O'Brien <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> To: alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Is `ccd' broken on Alpha? Message-ID: <20010328152453.A15677@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20010328151503.A88970@dragon.nuxi.com>; from obrien@FreeBSD.ORG on Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 03:15:03PM -0800 References: <20010328000954.C18676@dragon.nuxi.com> <15042.28453.158495.901316@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <20010328151503.A88970@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 03:15:03PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: > On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 06:09:25PM -0500, Andrew Gallatin wrote: > > Pilot error of some type? > > Maybe, but the same piloting works on i386. So something is being > treated differently between the two platforms. > > > It works fine for me using 'c' paritions. > > In general one should not use the `c' partition. Aren't you also seeing > disklabel complain that your `c' partition type isn't "unused"? Sigh. Using `c' rather than `e' (or [abd-h]) as the ccd partition works. So there is definitely something being treated differently on the Alpha than the i386 platform. Wilko (bmah?), something for the notes. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010328152453.A15677>