From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 24 21:14:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D1E116A4CE for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 21:14:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from chaos.evolve.za.net (chaos.evolve.za.net [196.34.172.107]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 043F143D2D for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 21:14:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dave@raven.za.net) Received: from root by chaos.evolve.za.net with scanned-ok (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1BdbYD-00014N-00 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 23:14:29 +0200 Received: from [165.165.109.75] (helo=lucy) by chaos.evolve.za.net with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1BdbYC-000140-00; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 23:14:28 +0200 From: "Dave Raven" To: "'Gordon Freeman'" Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 23:13:26 +0200 Message-ID: <00c001c45a30$17f615f0$3200000a@lucy> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2739.300 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <32ab229c040624140819fda1cd@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Scanned: by Opteq - www.optec.co.za cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Urgent 4.9 networking problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 21:14:34 -0000 Okay thank you I've been so confused with all this that it didn't even = occur to me - its now responding as expected - but I still have my original = TCP problem.. It takes EXTREMELY long to send the first SYN, once its done = that the entire session is perfect... Anyone at all? Any suggestions on further tests? Thanks again Dave -----Original Message----- From: Gordon Freeman [mailto:freebsdjunkie@gmail.com]=20 Sent: 24 June 2004 11:09 PM To: Dave Raven Subject: Re: Urgent 4.9 networking problems try ping -nR -c1 x.y.186.254 If you don't get the same "lag" then it is your DNS lookup that is causing the problem. On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 22:54:10 +0200, Dave Raven = wrote: >=20 > Hi all, > I really need some urgent help with this I'm completely = confused. I > have a FreeBSD 4.9 machine running ipfilter ipnat vrrp and a few other > services, today is the first time I tried to access through the = specific > method but now every interface and every local address I try has the = same > problem. I can ping anything - but any other kind of traffic waits for about > 2 minutes before transmitting - this is true with tcp and udp. I'm = trying to > access machines on the same network - and if I ping -R you can see the same > effect - pasted below. I've also included the interface that I'm = trying to > do this on although it seems to be happening on all my other = interfaces.. > I try to telnet to a cisco router that's on a switch I'm plugged in = and I > see the same behaviour - it just waits then suddenly responds very quickly. > My IpFilter rules don't log anything until it responds at which time = they > pass it - and tethereal + tcpdump also see if perfectly AFTER the long > delay. >=20 > It appears that its sitting on the kernel for 2 minutes??? It just = does > NOTHING then all of a sudden responds. The only thing I can find that works > is icmp - and perfectly. I'm sorry for the urgency but its very high > priority >=20 > Thanks in advance > Dave >=20 > # ifconfig fxp1 > fxp1: flags=3D8843 mtu 1500 > inet x.y.186.3 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast x.y.186.255 > inet x.y.186.1 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast x.y.186.1 > inet x.y.186.15 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast x.y.186.15 > inet x.y.186.14 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast x.y.186.14 > inet x.y.186.142 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast x.y.186.142 > inet x.y.186.33 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast x.y.186.33 > inet x.y.186.124 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast x.y.186.124 > inet x.y.186.250 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast x.y.186.250 > inet x.y.186.122 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast x.y.186.122 > inet x.y.186.25 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast x.y.186.25 > inet x.y.186.127 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast x.y.186.127 >=20 > # date ; ping -R -c1 x.y.186.253 ; date > Thu Jun 24 22:43:13 SAST 2004 > PING x.y.186.253 (152.110.186.253): 56 data bytes > 64 bytes from x.y.186.253: icmp_seq=3D0 ttl=3D255 time=3D0.414 ms > RR: x.y.186.253 > x.y.186.253 > x.y.186.3 >=20 > --- x.y.186.253 ping statistics --- > 1 packets transmitted, 1 packets received, 0% packet loss > round-trip min/avg/max/stddev =3D 0.414/0.414/0.414/0.000 ms > Thu Jun 24 22:46:58 SAST 2004 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >