From owner-freebsd-bugs Tue Aug 10 13:20:31 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E1D01546D for ; Tue, 10 Aug 1999 13:20:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id NAA17005; Tue, 10 Aug 1999 13:20:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1999 13:20:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199908102020.NAA17005@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Marcel Moolenaar Subject: Re: kern/12319: linux emu: getrusage causing core dumps Reply-To: Marcel Moolenaar Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR kern/12319; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Marcel Moolenaar To: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org, petr.rehor@decros.cz Cc: Subject: Re: kern/12319: linux emu: getrusage causing core dumps Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1999 22:17:50 +0200 The Linux getrusage syscall only accepts RUSAGE_SELF and RUSAGE_CHILDREN. RUSAGE_BOTH is only used internally. How does the emulated syscall differ from the Linux native syscall? Both return EINVAL for anything other than RUSAGE_SELF and RUSAGE_CHILDREN. How do you explain the coredump? Does the binary coredump on a Linux system? Do I miss something? Linux kernel version: 2.2.10 file: kernel/sys.c FreeBSD version: -current (7 aug 1999) file: kern/kern_resource.c -- Marcel Moolenaar mailto:marcel@scc.nl SCC Internetworking & Databases http://www.scc.nl/ Amsterdam, The Netherlands tel: +31 20 4200655 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message