Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 11:39:04 +0100
From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no>
To: Bernard van Gastel <bvgastel@bitpowder.com>
Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: pthread_{mutex,cond} & fifo/starvation/scheduling policy
Message-ID: <86sk9zagjb.fsf@ds4.des.no>
In-Reply-To: <72CE899C-5941-4659-B922-DC65BB0CE67D@bitpowder.com> (Bernard van Gastel's message of "Thu, 21 Jan 2010 11:19:34 %2B0100")
References: <71A129DC-68A0-46C3-956D-C8AFF1BA29E1@bitpowder.com> <86hbqifip8.fsf@ds4.des.no> <72CE899C-5941-4659-B922-DC65BB0CE67D@bitpowder.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bernard van Gastel <bvgastel@bitpowder.com> writes: > But the descheduling of threads if the mutex is not available is done > by the library. And especially the order of rescheduling of the > threads (thats what I'm interested in). Or am I missing something in > the sys/kern/sched files (btw I don't have the umtx file). Sorry, it's sys/kern/kern_umtx.c DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86sk9zagjb.fsf>