From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Sep 20 08:47:08 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D3741065672
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 08:47:08 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from mueller6727@bellsouth.net)
Received: from fmailhost04.isp.att.net (fmailhost04.isp.att.net
	[207.115.11.54])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D6268FC13
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 08:47:08 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 08:47:06 +0000 (GMT)
X-Comment: Sending client does not conform to RFC822 minimum requirements
X-Comment: Date has been added by Maillennium
Received: from localhost (adsl-72-147-183-55.sdf.bellsouth.net[72.147.183.55])
	by isp.att.net (frfwmhc04) with SMTP
	id <20110920084705H0400ircige>; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 08:47:06 +0000
X-Originating-IP: [72.147.183.55]
From: Thomay Mueller" <mueller6727@bellsouth.net>
To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
References: <4E775F6F.601@cyberbotx.com>
Message-Id: <20110920084708.5D3741065672@hub.freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Circular dependency in devel/doxygen?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 08:47:08 -0000

> Hey everyone, I maintain devel/doxygen (sorry I didn't add my 2 cents
> earlier, I've been a bit busy) and was looking at this particular thread.  I
> know someone filed a PR regarding the circular dependency, stating that it
> might be best to split apart doxygen so one port builds just the program and
> another port build just the documentation.  I am not sure if that is the
> best thing to do or not. I've been wanting to push out an update to doxygen
> but this has been a stopping block for me.
  
> Naram Qashat

It seems strange to me that doxygen would have audio dependencies, or is doxygen supposed to work with a speech synthesizer?

What dependencies would doxygen documentation have?  Anything circular?

I see abiword and abiword-docs are split in two separate ports.

Tom