From owner-freebsd-current Thu Mar 19 03:48:42 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id DAA11009 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Thu, 19 Mar 1998 03:48:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [195.8.129.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id DAA11002 for ; Thu, 19 Mar 1998 03:48:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA02558; Thu, 19 Mar 1998 12:47:07 +0100 (CET) To: Philippe Regnauld cc: Pierre Beyssac , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Using CVSUP and CTM together (Was Re: Disk munging problem with current solved) In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 19 Mar 1998 12:29:22 +0100." <19980319122922.28659@deepo.prosa.dk> Date: Thu, 19 Mar 1998 12:47:07 +0100 Message-ID: <2556.890308027@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <19980319122922.28659@deepo.prosa.dk>, Philippe Regnauld writes: >Pierre Beyssac writes: >> >> BTW, the code is the INRIA IPv6 code I ported from the FreeBSD 2.2.5 >> version. I hope to be able to release it within less than a week now. > > Note to the Core team: > Is it likely that this implementation will make it into -current ? > Or is it too big a piece to fit in the 3.0 puzzle ? I still think it is to early for us to decide which IPv6 stack to choose, so I don't expect to see IPv6 in 3.0 -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." "Drink MONO-tonic, it goes down but it will NEVER come back up!" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message