From owner-freebsd-stable  Wed Jan  5  4: 0:53 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from pcnet1.pcnet.com (pcnet1.pcnet.com [204.213.232.3])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D09B4150F5
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed,  5 Jan 2000 04:00:51 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from eischen@vigrid.com)
Received: (from eischen@localhost)
	by pcnet1.pcnet.com (8.8.7/PCNet) id HAA14331;
	Wed, 5 Jan 2000 07:00:49 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2000 07:00:49 -0500 (EST)
From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com>
Message-Id: <200001051200.HAA14331@pcnet1.pcnet.com>
To: eischen@vigrid.com, tg@melaten.rwth-aachen.de
Subject: Re: HEADS UP: major number for libc_r bumped
Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Thomas Gellekum <tg@melaten.rwth-aachen.de> wrote:
> due to some interface changes (different internal layout of pthread_t,
> POSIX compliant implementation of pthread_rwlockattr_setpshared()) I
> had to increase the major number of libc_r.so.

Just another thought here.  What happens when -current becomes the -stable
branch and we're forced to bump library versions again?  Are we going to
end up with libc_r.so.5 in -stable and libc_r.so.4 in current?

Dan Eischen
eischen@vigrid.com


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message