From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 19 13:03:27 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 808EC5D7 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:03:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Received: from mail-ia0-f182.google.com (mail-ia0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40BA48FC17 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:03:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ia0-f182.google.com with SMTP id x2so4244698iad.13 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 05:03:26 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=wf3XzInaS+wPea8ZC+WoLDzUOD4GfyeJtlCLwR6XSO0=; b=hB+SaPUqYrlyNRULAf0YC8sMLkycU6d+bW+6lyR0nrv7K+YsFRECZR6SMeSlx+9Dlu SNP68+fzMeYxyX9iLyBi0x/BrwFwbpZNhvi/4wk4ftCCw+2Hb+MnWY3kQ1fEE8X5QnGX V/TW5KkO8B53mV7oujaxJax6O4QxWaDstbLwVRouIH5VEoHJZ3vTldMLf6wWtnVlqoBs V66+/iGQD75PDVjpNBFAVmEF1vNgZ3Rw3Xf0ImH+dlPgvKjdDMAIewVpuzKjIS1gH5op 6N6SiAACs3/qQjsJH8hMwNNBE/P+GRl53UAWhoFmMtYGdOppMppv24e2mmrsId76lxMR 0WXA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.169.102 with SMTP id ad6mr6506033igc.10.1353330206346; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 05:03:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.49.67 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 05:03:26 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [93.221.171.204] In-Reply-To: <86r4npixji.fsf@universe.org> References: <50A7F53D.7070408@dreamchaser.org> <50A9823F.9070703@bananmonarki.se> <50aa3bd8.YBUNwRI62fWVDOC2%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <86r4npixji.fsf@universe.org> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 14:03:26 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: wine-fbsd64 -- no longer in ports From: "C. P. Ghost" To: Hexing Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmOziGXyfpHErffbPfa/GRPhcuHlRctdGFasAnqwbpJYOgeJhMnSxia1K6TcqIWxYgbhtOn Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:03:27 -0000 On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Hexing wrote: > perryh@pluto.rain.com (Perry Hutchison) writes: > >> Bernt Hansson wrote: >>> On 2012-11-17 21:36, Gary Aitken wrote: >>> > # portmaster -n emulators/wine-fbsd64 >>> > ===>>> No /usr/ports/emulators/wine-fbsd64 exists, and no information >>> > ===>>> about emulators/wine-fbsd64 can be found in /usr/ports/MOVED >>> > hints? >>> There has never been such a port, you have to install from package. >> >> Ordinarily, packages are created by building ports. >> If this one is an exception, how is it created? > > I guess that just remove it and install /usr/ports/emulators/wine or > /usr/ports/emulators/wine-devel would be OK. Nope, not for amd64: % grep 'ONLY_FOR_ARCHS' /usr/ports/emulators/wine/Makefile ONLY_FOR_ARCHS= i386 % grep 'ONLY_FOR_ARCHS' /usr/ports/emulators/wine-devel/Makefile ONLY_FOR_ARCHS= i386 The wine and wine-devel ports won't even compile on amd64. There was some guy who claims to have managed creating a binary _package_ for amd64 somehow, and wo sent periodic announcement updates about to this list. I don't know if it was legit or not: I never install stuff bypassing ports. But apparently, he didn't create a _port_, nor did he modify/enhance the current i386-only wine ports. > The name 'wine-fbsd64' looks strange. You installed it before? and > when did you find this name? -cpghost. -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/