From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Jul  7 11:17:03 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: office@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [69.147.83.53])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB349106564A;
	Sat,  7 Jul 2012 11:17:03 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from opti.dougb.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36])
	by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CB581502D8;
	Sat,  7 Jul 2012 11:17:03 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <4FF81AAF.4000402@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2012 04:17:03 -0700
From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
	rv:13.0) Gecko/20120621 Thunderbird/13.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: office@FreeBSD.org
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.2
OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: FreeBSD ports list <freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: libreoffice, 10-current, and clang
X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD <freebsd-office.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-office>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-office-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-office>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-office@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-office-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-office>,
	<mailto:freebsd-office-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2012 11:17:03 -0000

Even though I am on 10-current, where the clang --version is nominally
the same as the one in ports, the current version of the libreoffice
port is telling me I need to install the clang port. Why?

Also, the port has this:

CXXCPP= ${LOCALBASE}/bin/clang++ -E
CPP=    ${LOCALBASE}/bin/clang -E

whereas for CPP at least the wiki says specifically not to do that, but
to use clang-cpp instead. Why the discrepancy here?

Doug

-- 

    This .signature sanitized for your protection