From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 7 20:21:11 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B94201065684 for ; Mon, 7 Jul 2008 20:21:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from paul@gtcomm.net) Received: from atlas.gtcomm.net (atlas.gtcomm.net [67.215.15.242]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 880408FC2B for ; Mon, 7 Jul 2008 20:21:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from paul@gtcomm.net) Received: from c-76-108-197-4.hsd1.fl.comcast.net ([76.108.197.4] helo=[192.168.1.6]) by atlas.gtcomm.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1KFx93-0003lj-DW; Mon, 07 Jul 2008 16:17:09 -0400 Message-ID: <48727B31.3070003@gtcomm.net> Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 16:23:13 -0400 From: Paul User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike Tancsa References: <4867420D.7090406@gtcomm.net> <200806301944.m5UJifJD081781@lava.sentex.ca> <20080701004346.GA3898@stlux503.dsto.defence.gov.au> <20080701010716.GF3898@stlux503.dsto.defence.gov.au> <486986D9.3000607@monkeybrains.net> <48699960.9070100@gtcomm.net> <20080701033117.GH83626@cdnetworks.co.kr> <4869ACFC.5020205@gtcomm.net> <4869B025.9080006@gtcomm.net> <486A7E45.3030902@gtcomm.net> <486A8F24.5010000@gtcomm.net> <486A9A0E.6060308@elischer.org> <486B41D5.3060609@gtcomm.net> <4871E85C.8090907@freebsd.org> <48726422.7050703@gtcomm.net> <200807072006.m67K6GTE020938@lava.sentex.ca> In-Reply-To: <200807072006.m67K6GTE020938@lava.sentex.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Net Subject: Re: Freebsd IP Forwarding performance (question, and some info) [7-stable, current, em, smp] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 20:21:11 -0000 I hope so, if they maintain the driver then why wouldn't they make it take advantage of their own hardware? I hope they are stuck focusing on windows users :/ Mike Tancsa wrote: > At 02:44 PM 7/7/2008, Paul wrote: >> Also my 82571 NIC supports multiple received queues and multiple >> transmit queues so why hasn't >> anyone written the driver to support this? It's not a 10gb card and >> it still supports it and it's widely > > > Intel actually maintains the driver. Not sure if there are plans or > not, but perhaps they can comment ? > > ---Mike