From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Aug 25 19:20:00 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D0E816A4BF
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Mon, 25 Aug 2003 19:20:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from canning.wemm.org (canning.wemm.org [192.203.228.65])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44AB043FE3
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Mon, 25 Aug 2003 19:20:00 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from peter@wemm.org)
Received: from wemm.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by canning.wemm.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 25AC22A7EA; Mon, 25 Aug 2003 19:20:00 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from peter@wemm.org)
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4
To: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>
In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.0.20030825220024.07324008@209.112.4.2> 
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 19:20:00 -0700
From: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org>
Message-Id: <20030826022000.25AC22A7EA@canning.wemm.org>
cc: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com>
cc: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: PAE removal patch for testing 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 02:20:00 -0000

Mike Tancsa wrote:
> At 04:51 PM 25/08/2003 -0500, Mike Silbersack wrote:
> 
> >Right now, anyone who is experiencing problems should definitely try that
> >short patch which Mike Tancsa said works for him and confirm whether or
> >not it fixes the issue on their system.
> 
> The 2 servers I am running it on both have been stable since applying it.
> ns4% uptime
>   9:58PM  up 2 days,  4:27, 2 users, load averages: 0.02, 0.03, 0.05
> ns4%
> 
> would have rebooted several times by now.  The other machine is also 
> stable.  Both are quite busy mail routers. One also runs spamassassin via a 
> milter.

This change matches -current and should probably be committed ASAP.

Cheers,
-Peter
--
Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com
"All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5