From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 3 11:06:23 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5FA916A4CE for ; Mon, 3 May 2004 11:06:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gw.celabo.org (gw.celabo.org [208.42.49.153]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06F8743D49 for ; Mon, 3 May 2004 11:06:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nectar@celabo.org) Received: from madman.celabo.org (madman.celabo.org [10.0.1.111]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "madman.celabo.org", Issuer "celabo.org CA" (not verified)) by gw.celabo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C74754840; Mon, 3 May 2004 13:06:22 -0500 (CDT) Received: by madman.celabo.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id E2E786FF34; Mon, 3 May 2004 13:06:21 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 3 May 2004 13:06:21 -0500 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" To: Artur Pydo Message-ID: <20040503180621.GA16203@madman.celabo.org> Mail-Followup-To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" , Artur Pydo , freebsd-security@freebsd.org References: <40965500.4040205@pydo.org> <20040503144335.GA15293@madman.celabo.org> <40968883.3070103@pydo.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40968883.3070103@pydo.org> X-Url: http://www.celabo.org/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bad VuXML check on PNG port ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Security issues [members-only posting] List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 May 2004 18:06:24 -0000 On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 07:59:31PM +0200, Artur Pydo wrote: > Hello, > > Jacques A. Vidrine wrote: > > >The VuXML document needed to be updated after ache@ made the fix. > >I've done so now. > > Yes but the file located at : > > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/local-distfiles/eik/auditfile.tbz > > has not been updated and it works as the reference database for > portaudit and, i suppose, for the pkg_install-base-devel ports. > > Nothing has changed for me even after updating the ports tree > and the portaudit reference file. I know that there is a workaround > modifying 'auditfile' by hand as it is a ascii file. What you are describing is a problem with portaudit. You might want to contact eik@ to determine why the lag time. > I suggest that in future one avoid setting vulnerable versions as > 0 > because the update fails as long as the reference file has not been > updated with the correct vulnerable port later. > > In this case it would be much more efficient to set 'png<1.2.5_3' > from the beginning. I guess you mean `png <= 1.2.5_3'. That approach has its own problems, but I do use it sometimes if I am quite certain of which later port version will be fixed. Cheers, -- Jacques Vidrine / nectar@celabo.org / jvidrine@verio.net / nectar@freebsd.org