From owner-cvs-all Sat Apr 20 0:27:50 2002 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from rwcrmhc51.attbi.com (rwcrmhc51.attbi.com [204.127.198.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C633237B400; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 00:27:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bmah.dyndns.org ([12.233.149.189]) by rwcrmhc51.attbi.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP id <20020420072741.BXJM1143.rwcrmhc51.attbi.com@bmah.dyndns.org>; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 07:27:41 +0000 Received: from intruder.bmah.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by bmah.dyndns.org (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g3K7Rfnm046220; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 00:27:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bmah@intruder.bmah.org) Received: (from bmah@localhost) by intruder.bmah.org (8.12.2/8.12.2/Submit) id g3K7ReLt046219; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 00:27:40 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200204200727.g3K7ReLt046219@intruder.bmah.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5+ 20020416 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Hajimu UMEMOTO Cc: Doug Barton , bmah@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: etc mfc In-reply-to: References: <20020417124043.K4228-100000@master.gorean.org> Comments: In-reply-to Hajimu UMEMOTO message dated "Fri, 19 Apr 2002 23:47:23 +0900." From: bmah@FreeBSD.org (Bruce A. Mah) Reply-To: bmah@FreeBSD.org X-Face: g~c`.{#4q0"(V*b#g[i~rXgm*w;:nMfz%_RZLma)UgGN&=j`5vXoU^@n5v4:OO)c["!w)nD/!!~e4Sj7LiT'6*wZ83454H""lb{CC%T37O!!'S$S&D}sem7I[A 2V%N&+ X-Image-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/Images/bmah-cisco-small.gif X-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/ Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 00:27:40 -0700 Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG If memory serves me right, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: > DougB> That depends on your perspective on this I suppose... My reason > ing > DougB> at the time was that since all entries in inetd.conf are commented out > by > DougB> default, turning the daemon on by default is silly. Also, users who > DougB> actually want inetd for something will likely have entries in > DougB> /etc/rc.conf[.local] either by design, or via sysinstall. However, if > you > DougB> believe strongly that the default should continue to be YES, my feelin > gs > DougB> won't be hurt if you change it. > > I myself doesn't have strong objection about changing it. However, I > believe that /etc/rc.conf(.local) of not few poeple doesn't have > inetd_enable=YES. So, this change should be described in UPDATING and > relnotes. I would strongly like to see the inetd_enable change backed out. Ultimately, having inetd disabled by default is a Good Thing (TM), but doing the change in the middle of the 4-STABLE train will cause (and is causing) too much disruption. In my opinion, the badness outweighs the goodness. In any case, I will make the necessary entries for the release notes. (Apparently, I haven't yet documented this change for -CURRENT, either.) Bruce. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message