From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Dec 13 19:27:11 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5702B37B401 for ; Fri, 13 Dec 2002 19:27:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp0.adl1.internode.on.net (smtp0.adl1.internode.on.net [203.16.214.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5969E43EB2 for ; Fri, 13 Dec 2002 19:27:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from malcolm.kay@adelaide.on.net) Received: from adelaide.on.net (ppp730.sa.padsl.internode.on.net [150.101.245.217]) by smtp0.adl1.internode.on.net (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id gBE3R5p5094965 for ; Sat, 14 Dec 2002 13:57:05 +1030 (CST) Message-ID: <3DFAA545.3080708@adelaide.on.net> Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2002 13:58:05 +1030 From: malcolm kay User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:0.9.7) Gecko/20020812 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [Fwd: Mail and FreeBSD 4.7] References: <3DFA8609.8030609@adelaide.on.net> <3LvK9.13166$0b.515118@news2.east.cox.net> <3DFA9A93.7060706@adelaide.on.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG The attachment to my previous e-mail seems to have fallen in a hole. Here is the information that should have been included. Ray Kohler wrote: > In article <3DFA9A93.7060706@adelaide.on.net>, malcolm kay wrote: > >>Ray Kohler wrote: >> >> >>>In article <3DFA8609.8030609@adelaide.on.net>, malcolm kay wrote: >>> >>> >>>>I've been installing and running FreeBSD since release 2.0.5 with >>>>very few problems. >>>> >>>>But now with 4.7 I find there is some fundamental difference in the >>>>mail structure. I find local mail ends up in /var/spool/clientmqueue >>>>instead of the traditional /var/spool/mqueue which is fine except >>>>that it stays there without ever getting distributed to targetted >>>>recipients. >>>> >>>>Does anyone know what I am overlooking? - probably something rather >>>>obvious :( >>>> >>>Sendmail 8.12 has some odd new rules. There has to be a daemon always >>>running, even if it only listens on the loopback interface, in order >>>to get mail delivered. It's a side-effect of the new >>>priveledge-separation model of recent sendmail versions. >>> >>>So have a look at /etc/rc.conf. It's ok to have sendmail_enable=NO >>>but if you set it to NONE or set the other sendmail_*_enable >>>variables to NO, you'll have problems. >>> >>>If you're still stuck, post the output of 'ps ax'. >>> >>$ ps ax >> >> PID TT STAT TIME COMMAND >> 0 ?? DLs 0:00.00 (swapper) >> 1 ?? ILs 0:00.02 /sbin/init -- >> 2 ?? DL 0:00.61 (pagedaemon) >> 3 ?? DL 0:00.00 (vmdaemon) >> 4 ?? DL 0:01.71 (bufdaemon) >> 5 ?? DL 16:36.91 (syncer) >> 6 ?? DL 0:03.18 (vnlru) >> 68 ?? Ss 0:22.30 /usr/sbin/syslogd -s >> 71 ?? Ss 0:24.36 /usr/sbin/ntpd -p /var/run/ntpd.pid >> 77 ?? Ss 0:00.03 /usr/sbin/inetd -wW >> 79 ?? Ss 0:06.54 /usr/sbin/cron >> 82 ?? Is 0:00.02 /usr/sbin/lpd >> 84 ?? Is 0:00.87 /usr/sbin/sshd >> 86 ?? Is 0:02.03 /usr/sbin/usbd >> 89 ?? Ss 0:31.17 sendmail: accepting connections (sendmail) >> 92 ?? Is 0:01.55 sendmail: Queue runner@00:30:00 for /var/spool/client >>30019 ?? Ss 0:00.01 rlogind >>30020 p0 Ss 0:00.05 -tcsh (tcsh) >>30025 p0 S 0:00.04 _su (csh) >>30027 p0 R+ 0:00.00 ps ax >>23840 v0 Is+ 0:00.01 /usr/libexec/getty Pc ttyv0 >> 124 v1 Is+ 0:00.01 /usr/libexec/getty Pc ttyv1 >> 125 v3 Is+ 0:00.01 /usr/libexec/getty Pc ttyv3 >> 126 v4 Is+ 0:00.01 /usr/libexec/getty Pc ttyv4 >> 127 v5 Is+ 0:00.01 /usr/libexec/getty Pc ttyv5 >> 128 v6 Is+ 0:00.01 /usr/libexec/getty Pc ttyv6 >> 129 v7 Is+ 0:00.01 /usr/libexec/getty Pc ttyv7 >> >>And the content of /etc/rc.conf (less comment lines) >> >>defaultrouter="192.1.3.210" >>hostname="satan2.admin" >>ifconfig_vr0="inet 192.1.3.227 netmask 255.255.255.0" >>inetd_enable="YES" >>kern_securelevel_enable="NO" >>linux_enable="YES" >>nfs_reserved_port_only="YES" >>sendmail_enable="YES" >>sshd_enable="YES" >>usbd_enable="YES" >>xntpd_enable="YES" >>saver="IES" >>lpd_enable="YES" >> >>Further ideas? >> > > 'Fraid not. You'd better ask on freebsd-questions. I'd suggest just > forwarding this message so they know what's already been tried and can > get to the meat of it quickly. > > Thank you for your attention, Malcolm Kay To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message