From owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 12 08:26:53 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60E9F16A4CE for ; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 08:26:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 480CF43D46; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 08:26:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from davidxu@freebsd.org) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (davidxu@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j3C8Qnox084860; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 08:26:50 GMT (envelope-from davidxu@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <425B866C.4010609@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 16:27:24 +0800 From: David Xu User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.6) Gecko/20050319 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marc Olzheim References: <200504111210.j3BCAZmU002870@freefall.freebsd.org> <425B02BB.5060904@freebsd.org> <20050412071220.GA17393@stack.nl> In-Reply-To: <20050412071220.GA17393@stack.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Subject: Re: threads/76690: fork hang in child for (-lc_r & -lthr) X-BeenThere: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Threading on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 08:26:53 -0000 Marc Olzheim wrote: >On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 07:05:31AM +0800, David Xu wrote: > > >>>Confirmed to be b0rken on FreeBSD 4.11's libc_r as well. :-/ >>> >>>Marc >>> >>> >>> >>This is no longer true for libthr, I can not close the PR >>because it also reports libc_r problem. >> >> > >I know, I didn't ask for it to be closed. :-) >Is there any info on where the bug could be ? I could take a look at >it... > >Marc > > You have to fix it in uthread_fork.c, lock __malloc_lock over __sys_fork() call. but why libc_r ? it is depreciated. David Xu