From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Aug  6 19:52:22 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id TAA25945
          for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 6 Aug 1996 19:52:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from whistle.com (s205m131.whistle.com [207.76.205.131])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id TAA25937;
          Tue, 6 Aug 1996 19:52:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from smap@localhost) by whistle.com (8.7.5/8.6.12) id TAA23698; Tue, 6 Aug 1996 19:50:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from current1.whistle.com(207.76.205.22) by whistle.com via smap (V1.3)
	id sma023696; Tue Aug  6 19:50:40 1996
Message-ID: <32080459.167EB0E7@whistle.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Aug 1996 19:50:01 -0700
From: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com>
Organization: Whistle Communications
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0b4 (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2-CURRENT i386)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tom Samplonius <tom@sdf.com>
CC: Julian Elischer <julian@freefall.freebsd.org>,
        hackers@freefall.freebsd.org
Subject: Re: I have 2 patches 
References: <Pine.NEB.3.94.960806184234.5893A-100000@misery.sdf.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Tom Samplonius wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 6 Aug 1996, Julian Elischer wrote:
> 
> > I'd like to submit and check in 2 pathches.
> > they add functionality to inetd and ftpd$
> >
> > Basically they allow each to run against a single interface.
> > This allows a machine to present totally different services on the
> > inside and outside of  a firewall system.
> >
> > The patches are on freefall in ~julian
> > or in www.whistle.com/people/julian
> >
> > I'd like to commit them soon (tomorrow?)
> >
> > julian
> >
> >
> >
> 
>   xinetd (in ports) already does this.  I'm against extending the current
> inetd because of this.

The patches to inetd are not extensive. I'd rather
run with the standard item than have to introduce 
an external item into our product..
If you lookat the patch, and still think that it is too  large
then I'd be surprised..

It makes quite a difference to the work we need to do


> 
>   xinetd also has access control, and can limit active processes per
> service.
> 
> Tom