From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 14 15:51:31 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2846516A402 for ; Sat, 14 Apr 2007 15:51:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brett@lariat.net) Received: from lariat.net (lariat.net [66.119.58.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C32113C448 for ; Sat, 14 Apr 2007 15:51:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brett@lariat.net) Received: from anne-o1dpaayth1.lariat.org (IDENT:ppp1000.lariat.net@lariat.net [66.119.58.2]) by lariat.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA07865; Sat, 14 Apr 2007 09:51:26 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200704141551.JAA07865@lariat.net> X-message-flag: Warning! Use of Microsoft Outlook renders your system susceptible to Internet worms. X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 09:51:23 -0600 To: Philipp Wuensche From: Brett Glass In-Reply-To: <4620D1DD.5050902@h3q.com> References: <200704140121.TAA29887@lariat.net> <4620D1DD.5050902@h3q.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Virally licensed code in FreeBSD kernel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 15:51:31 -0000 There is a huge problem in that the CDDL is "viral." It "infects" products with which it is combined. You can read the text of the CDDL at http://www.opensource.org/licenses/cddl1.php Section 3.1 of the CDDL is the portion which is essentially equivalent to the GPL. This is part of the nastiness of viral licenses. --Brett Glass At 07:06 AM 4/14/2007, Philipp Wuensche wrote: >Brett Glass wrote: >> I just read with some concern the announcement that Sun's ZFS has been >> integrated into the FreeBSD kernel. This would mean, unfortunately, that >> FreeBSD is now covered by the CDDL, which is a viral license similar to >> the GPL. Has FreeBSD abandoned its longstanding practice of keeping the >> kernel truly free? > >Maybe this blog entry brings some light: >http://blogs.sun.com/chandan/entry/copyrights_licenses_and_cddl_illustrated > >I don't see a problem. If you use CDDL licensed stuff like ZFS, you need >to provide the source, thats it. > >greetigns, >philipp