From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org  Sun Feb  7 13:44:21 2016
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85B14AA12F7
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Sun,  7 Feb 2016 13:44:21 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76352DA6
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Sun,  7 Feb 2016 13:44:21 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u17DiK0p085482
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 7 Feb 2016 13:44:21 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 206886] math/openblas: Update to 0.2.15
Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2016 13:44:20 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages
X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s)
X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa, patch
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People
X-Bugzilla-Who: rakuco@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: Open
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback+ merge-quarterly?
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-206886-13-OIUEOuQtv5@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-206886-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-206886-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2016 13:44:21 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D206886

--- Comment #8 from Raphael Kubo da Costa <rakuco@FreeBSD.org> ---
The new patch may risk introducing the bug that the commit adding prioritie=
s to
the constructor and destructor attributes tried to fix
(https://github.com/xianyi/openblas/issues/654) even for GCC versions which=
 do
support that feature (basically anything newer than base GCC).

How about this instead:

--- driver/others/memory.c
+++ driver/others/memory.c
@@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILIT=
Y OF
SUCH DAMAGE.
 #if defined(_MSC_VER) && !defined(__clang__)
 #define CONSTRUCTOR __cdecl
 #define DESTRUCTOR __cdecl
-#elif defined(OS_DARWIN) && defined(C_GCC)
+#elif defined(OS_DARWIN) || (defined(C_GCC) && ((__GNUC__ =3D=3D 4) &&
(__GNUC_MINOR__ < 3)))
 #define CONSTRUCTOR    __attribute__ ((constructor))
 #define DESTRUCTOR     __attribute__ ((destructor))
 #else

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=