From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 2 20:35:47 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 120221065679 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 20:35:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marshc187@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.159]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E6F58FC17 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 20:35:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marshc187@gmail.com) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l26so1939481fgb.35 for ; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 13:35:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; bh=joBe9Ov6KP3S8L9ChPNN3d0y185rj624dVlLzrMbU6I=; b=rsvYLM/HvffzG0dc1zjbwTaO/x275GzsPiT2PKEPkjeaJZTM4V2K6e9sMRl+yox+in 9Ee8WCE2q+85ZmEWBSRin2Ij6PE3VolyKQoFux2lwMM8XNx4osc3hRQuimGmkTcXnCje imj1Jc/vNbfRmIbXBt/pwrcoNkjrHoWy55siA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :message-id; b=aeZ7LNJcEQRN0AfwMi5wpD89SvMAQXNPDijUza8qXhyC5TDRL87tZKT1qOrlMlZc3Y 3w9gZd25vBGstJROHOlcs9HThIeg/l1KwL5dsAw1FD8vI+kOAs4NgMh0qgol/7Cz6KrI wbE/w4Cr4wkfsXN8VBwD4useBE3UBhOEjOjpI= Received: by 10.86.79.19 with SMTP id c19mr1921413fgb.79.1217709345207; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 13:35:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.2.101? ( [195.158.125.245]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d6sm1058875fga.2.2008.08.02.13.35.43 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 02 Aug 2008 13:35:43 -0700 (PDT) From: mcassar To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 22:35:40 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <200808021550.48302.marshc187@gmail.com> <18580.47343.395943.288119@jerusalem.litteratus.org> In-Reply-To: <18580.47343.395943.288119@jerusalem.litteratus.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200808022235.40815.marshc187@gmail.com> Subject: Re: gemeral questions (noobish) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 20:35:47 -0000 On Saturday 02 August 2008 21:43:43 Robert Huff wrote: > Michael Powell writes: > > I can only speak to cvsup or csup (which I use) but I'd like to point > > out a very common mistake wrt either. It is a good idea to have two > > different sup files, as they will need to download different collections > > of material. For example this: > > > > *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_7_0 > > src-all > > > > combination will pull down the system sources for the security updates > > to RELEASE. Read in the Handbook about the tags and collections. > > > > I keep a separate sup file for keeping the ports tree updated and the > > difference is here: > > > > *default release=cvs tag=. > > ports-all > > I have a file for src-, one for ports-, and one for doc-. > > > Robert Huff so most of you _do_ use or prefer csup/cvsup more than portsnap, right?