From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 17 16:01:21 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 083BC1065672 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 16:01:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from christer.solskogen@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-f182.google.com (mail-wi0-f182.google.com [209.85.212.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9475E8FC1A for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 16:01:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhq12 with SMTP id hq12so2449074wib.13 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 08:01:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=W3rqPd1StTYNthCafXKENJf5fnshuPL+R+QK2JEWMyA=; b=jbVw1J52wwWjz5Ma2Ccvkm5lgeYPDcU1Noyf8orcp67HOm/vKFmsFJcGZnXpBnxwAr l8lce4/vRi27uHhFGu3UzUaiLJlLciZyrK4cfX6tBFfW2DZAlViM+yDBuuaT/MeN+yg8 g6tTrwcpz8f3eTnx7eoIGmOkksoFFAp7WQsq8= Received: by 10.180.93.193 with SMTP id cw1mr29506439wib.5.1326816079571; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 08:01:19 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.142.20 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 08:00:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Christer Solskogen Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 17:00:58 +0100 Message-ID: To: Shawn Webb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: FreeBSD Stable Subject: Re: ZFS / zpool size X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 16:01:21 -0000 On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Shawn Webb wrote: > The `zpool` command does not show all the overhead from ZFS. The `zfs` > command does. That's why the `zfs` command shows less available space > than the `zpool` command. > A overhead of almost 300GB? That seems a bit to much, don't you think? The pool consist of one vdev with two 1,5TB disks and one 3TB in raidz1. -- chs,