From owner-freebsd-isp Sun Jan 31 13:36:08 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA25689 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Sun, 31 Jan 1999 13:36:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from roble.com (roble.com [207.5.40.50]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA25682 for ; Sun, 31 Jan 1999 13:36:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sendmail@roble.com) Received: from roble2.roble.com (roble2.roble.com [207.5.40.52]) by roble.com (Roble1b) with SMTP id NAA01389 for ; Sun, 31 Jan 1999 13:36:06 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 31 Jan 1999 13:36:06 -0800 (PST) From: Roger Marquis To: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Service providing for virtual users In-Reply-To: <00b401be4d38$91cea960$21fce0d1@westbend.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > Maybe someone on the list knows of other options for the uploading of > pages. People are working on standards-based methods for uploading > pages via http, but I don't think they are ready for prime time. What's the advantage to frontpage using mod_put and frontpage using ftp? If there are no advantages why not have the customer use ftp? Seems to work here and it doesn't force us to support a protocol that was designed to circumvent open systems standards. -- Roger Marquis Roble Systems Consulting http://www.roble.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message