From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 16 04:24:04 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BDD716A4CE for ; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 04:24:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from out006.verizon.net (out006pub.verizon.net [206.46.170.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D971C43D46 for ; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 04:24:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ringworm01@gmail.com) Received: from ringworm.mechee.com ([4.26.84.7]) by out006.verizon.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.06 201-253-122-130-106-20030910) with ESMTP id <20050216042403.TQYZ28674.out006.verizon.net@ringworm.mechee.com> for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 22:24:03 -0600 Received: by ringworm.mechee.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 5D9FB2CE747; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 20:19:45 -0800 (PST) From: "Michael C. Shultz" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <1044.209.87.176.132.1108491312.fusewebmail-19592@www.fusemail.com> <200502151132.09583.reso3w83@verizon.net> <4212C68B.70006@fusemail.com> In-Reply-To: <4212C68B.70006@fusemail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 20:19:44 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200502152019.45016.ringworm01@gmail.com> X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out006.verizon.net from [4.26.84.7] at Tue, 15 Feb 2005 22:24:03 -0600 Subject: Re: Error in port upgrade (was Re: portmanager hosed) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 04:24:04 -0000 On Tuesday 15 February 2005 08:05 pm, you wrote: > Michael C. Shultz wrote: > >On Tuesday 15 February 2005 10:15 am, Brian John wrote: > >>When I try to upgrade my ports I just get error messages. Can > >>someone help me out? I'll paste the output below. > >> > >>Thanks > >> > >>/Brian > >> > >>su-2.05b# portmanager -u > >>portmanager 0.2.6_5 info: executing rm -f > >>/usr/local/share/portmanager/ports_cache.db > >>------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>-- --- PMGRrStatus 0.2.6_5 info: Creating inital data bases > >>------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>-- --- > >>------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>-- --- PMGRrStatus 0.2.6_5 info: looking for missing dependent > >> ports > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------ > >>--- --- > >>------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>-- --- -=>MISSING<=- linux_base-8-8.0_6[/emulators/linux_base-8] > >> may be a dependency of linuxpluginwrapper-20050119_1 > >>verifing dependency status of linux_base-8-8.0_6 (may take awhile) > >> by executing command: > >>cd /usr/ports/www/linuxpluginwrapper; make all-depends-list > >> * * * * > >>linux_base-8-8.0_6 is indeed a missing dependency, adding to list > >> of things to be updated > >> * * * * > >>checking for linux_base-8-8.0_6 dependencies that also may not be > >>installed listing linux_base-8-8.0_6's known dependencies by > >>executing command: cd /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-8; make > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>all-depends-list * * * * > >>dependency -=>archivers/rpm > >> executing: cd /usr/portsarchivers/rpm; make describe > >>cd: can't cd to /usr/portsarchivers/rpm > >>make: don't know how to make describe. Stop > > > >The path /usr/portsarchivers/rpm is mangled here. Sorry > >about this it looks like a portmanager bug :( I'll work on a fix > >right away. > > > >-Mike > > I tried your fix but it still doesn't seem to be working. The output > is below. > > Thanks very much for your help > > /Brian Brian, to get you past the problem all you need do is cd /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-rh-9 make deinstall cd ~ portmanager -u emulators/linux_base-rh-9 is conflicting with emulators/linux_base-8 This output you sent just identified a bug I've been trying to track down for ages! Thanks for sending it! It will be a few days to fix it but I think you will be ok when your remove /linux_base-rh-9. Let me know how it goes ok? -Mike