From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 12 22:54:36 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1C1D16A419 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2007 22:54:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@alastria.net) Received: from nebula.thdo.uk.alastria.net (unknown [IPv6:2001:ba8:0:1f0::5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C3A013C43E for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2007 22:54:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@alastria.net) Received: from [10.10.4.10] (dragon.lancs.uk.alastria.net [88.96.139.34]) (authenticated bits=0) by nebula.thdo.uk.alastria.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id lBCMsmYt020527 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2007 22:54:48 GMT (envelope-from peter@alastria.net) Message-ID: <476066A5.8070707@alastria.net> Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 22:54:29 +0000 From: Peter Wood Organization: Alastria Networks Limited User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Net References: <476061FD.8050500@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <476061FD.8050500@elischer.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Flag: NO X-Virus-Status: No X-Spam-Score: 0.137 () RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL X-Spam-Ultra-Flag: NO X-Spam-Low-Flag: NO X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-High-Flag: NO X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 212.13.198.8 Subject: Re: bikeshed for all! X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 22:54:36 -0000 > so, you see I really need a better name.... > setrtab? > > rtab? rtbl? > > and the command should be called "????" Would "vrf" (Virtual Routing and Forwarding) be to technical? From experience Cisco's call it vrf, Junipers use routing-instance IIRC. P. -- Peter Wood