From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Sep  6 11:05:14 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) id LAA18215
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 6 Sep 1995 11:05:14 -0700
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id LAA18195
          for <hackers@freefall.freebsd.org>; Wed, 6 Sep 1995 11:05:09 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id LAA03332; Wed, 6 Sep 1995 11:03:23 -0700
To: davidg@Root.COM
cc: Julian Elischer <julian@ref.tfs.com>, hackers@freefall.freebsd.org
Subject: Re: freefall's configuration broken 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 06 Sep 1995 03:03:15 PDT."
             <199509061003.DAA25591@corbin.Root.COM> 
Date: Wed, 06 Sep 1995 11:03:23 -0700
Message-ID: <3330.810410603@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>  The problem was caused by a mistake - the new libutil.so.2.0 was overwritten
> by an old one from the previous system. Since it was owned by jkh, I think
> we don't need to look too far to find the perpetrator... :-)

Perhaps, but you'll still have me scratching my head as to WHY.. :-{

Everything came from 2.1 stable and I didn't restore anything in
/usr/lib after the install - I only unpacked packages.  I hope that
one of our packs doesn't overlay libutil!  That would be a bummer.

Still, I can't see how it could have gotten replaced.

					Jordan