From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 1 21:20:20 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D140316A4CE; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 21:20:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from mandy.mts.ru (mandy.mts.ru [81.211.47.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9099543FDD; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 21:20:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tiamat@komi.mts.ru) Received: from maeko.inside.mts.ru (maeko [192.168.10.3]) by mandy.mts.ru with SMTP id hB25KAb07459; Tue, 2 Dec 2003 08:20:15 +0300 (MSK) Received: from stella.komi.mts.ru ([10.50.1.1]) by maeko.inside.mts.ru (NAVGW 2.5.2.12) with SMTP id M2003120208200907543 ; Tue, 02 Dec 2003 08:20:10 +0300 Received: from nbdav (nb-dav.komi.mts.ru [10.50.1.185]) (user=tiamat mech=NTLM bits=0) by stella.komi.mts.ru (MTS Komi/Smtp) with ESMTP id hB25K9Fm089235; Tue, 2 Dec 2003 08:20:09 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from tiamat@komi.mts.ru) Message-ID: <007101c3b893$f04e9150$b901320a@komi.mts.ru> From: "?????? ????????? ??????????" To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" References: <02be01c3b5a6$a78a8ea0$b901320a@komi.mts.ru> <200312010859.hB18x2Dw094198@grimreaper.grondar.org> <20031201180202.GD244@madman.celabo.org> Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 08:20:02 +0300 Organization: =?iso-8859-1?B?1Ojr6ODrIM7AziAizO7h6Ov87fvlINLl6+XR6PHy5ez7IiDiIOM=?= =?iso-8859-1?B?LtH76vL74urg8OUsINDKLg==?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Kerberized applications in FreeBSD 5.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Security issues [members-only posting] List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 05:20:20 -0000 > > You need to turn it obn by hand in /etc/pam.d/*. Its not on by default, > > because that would cause nasty delays in PAM. > > I think he meant *actual* Kerberos support i.e. at the protocol level, > not just password-authentication-via-Kerberos. Yes of course! Thanks!