From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Sep 6 9:51:15 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from cactus.fi.uba.ar (cactus.fi.uba.ar [157.92.49.108]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8282F37B401 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 09:51:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cactus.fi.uba.ar (cactus.fi.uba.ar [157.92.49.108]) by cactus.fi.uba.ar (8.11.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f86Gm4g66856; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 13:48:04 -0300 (ART) (envelope-from fgleiser@cactus.fi.uba.ar) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 13:48:04 -0300 (ART) From: Fernando Gleiser To: Robert Moss Cc: Subject: Re: ipfilter In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.1.0.20010906194756.02078a68@localhost> Message-ID: <20010906134329.M66160-100000@cactus.fi.uba.ar> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Robert Moss wrote: > options IPFILTER > options IPFILTER_LOG > > Leave out any other IPFIREWALL options as that is for a completely > different firewall package, and is not compatible with IPFilter. This is not true. I have both IPFILTER and IPFIREWALL in my kernel, using IPFIREWALL for shaping (dummynet) and ipf for filtering/nat. You need to be careful, but they can coexist. Fer To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message