From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Sep  9 02:05:11 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BE2616A4CE
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Thu,  9 Sep 2004 02:05:11 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from tomts22-srv.bellnexxia.net (tomts22.bellnexxia.net
	[209.226.175.184])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF8EB43D1D
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Thu,  9 Sep 2004 02:05:10 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from dashevil@sympatico.ca)
Received: from [192.168.2.32] ([65.93.56.19]) by tomts22-srv.bellnexxia.net
	ESMTP
	<20040909020510.VQQS15743.tomts22-srv.bellnexxia.net@[192.168.2.32]>;
	Wed, 8 Sep 2004 22:05:10 -0400
From: Chris Laverdure <dashevil@sympatico.ca>
To: David Syphers <dsyphers@u.washington.edu>
In-Reply-To: <200409081815.42409.dsyphers@u.washington.edu>
References: <20040908223234.415D443D45@mx1.FreeBSD.org>
	 <1094669901.634.3.camel@elemental.DashEvil>
	 <200409081815.42409.dsyphers@u.washington.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <1094681108.747.1.camel@elemental.DashEvil>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 
Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2004 22:05:09 +0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: X.org 6.8
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2004 02:05:11 -0000

On Thu, 2004-09-09 at 01:15, David Syphers wrote:
> On Wednesday 08 September 2004 11:58 am, Chris Laverdure wrote:
> > I'd rather not polute my system with files that aren't registered in the
> > package database. Since it seems to be so easy to get up, would it not
> > be similarly easy to modify the x.org ports?
> 
> Sure. So go change the Makefile, and you'll have your lovely new Xorg 
> registered properly, and won't bother everyone by complaining that you want a 
> major change to the ports during a freeze...

You misrepresent my intent. I was merely asking a series of questions,
not complaining. I didn't once state that the new X.Org release should
be in 5.3. 

Sorry if I have bothered you with this.