From owner-freebsd-chat Mon Jun 10 17:57:26 1996 Return-Path: owner-chat Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id RAA02308 for chat-outgoing; Mon, 10 Jun 1996 17:57:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [204.188.121.18]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id RAA02300 for ; Mon, 10 Jun 1996 17:57:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id RAA02108 for ; Mon, 10 Jun 1996 17:57:18 -0700 Message-Id: <199606110057.RAA02108@rah.star-gate.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.5 12/11/95 To: chat@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: BeBox mention of FreeBSD... In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 10 Jun 1996 14:57:15 PDT." <199606102157.OAA04670@phaeton.artisoft.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 10 Jun 1996 17:57:17 -0700 From: "Amancio Hasty Jr." Sender: owner-chat@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >From The Desk Of Terry Lambert : > > Saw this in the latest issue of the Be newsletter. Apparently I'm a > > registered Be developer now, but I'm going to save my money for a little > > bit before springing to buy one. Any BeBox owners on this list want to > > comment? For those of you who haven't heard of Be, http://www.be.com/ > > > > Thomas J. Merritt, president of CodeGen, on the BeBox: > > "I think it would make a terrific networking server. The only other thing > > that comes close in price/performance is a generic PC loaded with FreeBSD, > > ^^^^^^^ > > but that's a pain to configure. Windows NT and pay-for UNIX cost more, and You know I got to admit that it is a real pain in the butt to configure your network devices with sysinstall 8) Amancio