Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 22:00:38 -0400 From: "Michael P. Soulier" <msoulier@digitaltorque.ca> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: portupgrade upgrade procedure Message-ID: <20060821020038.GP29923@tigger.digitaltorque.ca>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--cfJ13FhsvNR/yOpm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, Why is the upgrade procedure recommended to be portupgrade -R <package> instead of=20 portupgrade -r <package> ? If -R is "Act on all those packages required by the given packages as well." isn't it more important to rebuild the packages that depend on the package being rebuilt, ala -r? Thanks, Mike --=20 Michael P. Soulier <msoulier@digitaltorque.ca> "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction." --Albert Einstein --cfJ13FhsvNR/yOpm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFE6RPGKGqCc1vIvggRAmeOAJ9cOmwuq3aEc2w/Y/8Ls083+Bi2jACfXhaW dXMPis5iyxuZxlkArNGVO18= =aBUb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cfJ13FhsvNR/yOpm--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060821020038.GP29923>